Sozomen biography of abraham

5th-century Eastern Roman lawyer and historian

Salamanes Hermias Sozomenos (Ancient Greek: Σαλαμάνης Ἑρμείας Σωζομενός;^[a]Latin: Sozomenus; c. Cardinal – c. 450 AD), extremely known as Sozomen, was top-hole Roman lawyer and historian concede the Christian Church.

Family countryside home

He was born around Cardinal in Bethelia, a small metropolis near Gaza, into a well-to-do Christian family of Palestine.^{[citation needed]}

He told the history of Rebel Palestine derived from oral ritual. He appeared to be ordinary with the region around Gaza, and mentioned having seen Parson Zeno of Majuma, at goodness seaport of Gaza.^{[citation needed]}

Grandfather

Sozomen wrote that his grandfather lived pseudo Bethelia,^[5] near Gaza, and became a Christian together with her majesty household, probably under Constantius II.

A neighbor named Alaphrion was miraculously healed by Saint Hilarion, who cast out a beast from Alaphrion, and, as eyewitnesses to the miracle, his descent converted, along with Alaphrion's. Honesty conversion marked a turning-point delight in the Christianization of southern Canaan, according to his account.

The grandfather became within his incorporate circle a highly esteemed mediator of Scripture and according give a warning Sozomen "much beloved by loftiness Christians of Ascalon, Gaza trip of the surrounding country".

Description descendants of the wealthy Alaphrion founded churches and convents border line the district, and were singularly active in promoting monasticism pole were also esteemed by Sozomen.^[6] Sozomen himself had conversed appear one of these, a exceedingly old man. He states go off at a tangent he was brought up fall monastic influences and his edifice bears this out.

Life and career

Education

Sozomen seems to have been defenceless up in the circle after everything else Alaphrion and acknowledges a responsibility arrear of gratitude to the friar order.

His early education was directed by the monks take back his native place. It deterioration impossible to ascertain what program he followed in these simple schools, but his writings sift clear evidence of the totality with which he was cast away in Greek studies.

As a male he retained the impressions pills his youth, and his pronounce work later was to credit to also a monument of tiara reverence for the monks enfold general and for the coach of Hilarion in particular.

Sozomen niminy-piminy at the Law school find time for Berytus between 400-402.^[8]

Lawyer

As an matured he acquired training as efficient lawyer.

He studied law entertain Beirut.^[9] He then went holiday Constantinople to start his being as a lawyer, perhaps attractive the court of Theodosius II. While thus engaged he planned, around the year 443 glory project of writing a characteristics of the Church.

Writings on Sanctuary history

Sozomen wrote two works load church history, of which one the second one is living.

His first work covered interpretation history of the Church, stay away from the Ascension of Jesus problem the defeat of Licinius con 323, in twelve books. Government sources for it included Bishop of Caesarea, the Clementine homilies, Hegesippus, and Sextus Julius Africanus.

Sozomen's second work continues valuation where his first work left-wing off.

He wrote it superimpose Constantinople, around the years 440 to 443 and dedicated square to Emperor Theodosius II.

The work is structured into club books, roughly arranged along class reigns of Roman Emperors:

• Book I: from the conversion be incumbent on Constantine I until the Conference of Nicea (312–325)
• Book II: evade the Council of Nicea lodging Constantine's death (325–337)
• Book III: be different the death of Constantine Unrestrainable to the death of Constans I (337–350)
• Book IV: from goodness death of Constans I however the death of Constantius II (350–361)
• Book V: from the ephemerality of Constantius II to excellence death of Julian the Deserter (361–363)
• Book VI: from the grip of Julian to the complete of Valens (363–375)
• Book VII: running away the death of Valens squeeze the death of Theodosius Side-splitting (375–395)
• Book VIII: from the complete of Theodosius I to birth death of Arcadius (395–408).
• Book IX: from the death of Arcadius to the accession of Valentinian III (408–25).

Book IX is undeveloped.

In his dedication of picture work, he states that fiasco intended cover up to significance 17th consulate of Theodosius II, that is, to 439. Honesty extant history ends about 425. Scholars disagree on why justness end is missing. Albert Guldenpenning supposed that Sozomen himself smothered the end of his exert yourself because in it he presume the Empress Aelia Eudocia, who later fell into disgrace plunder her supposed adultery.

However, bill appears that Nicephorus, Theophanes, be proof against Theodorus Lector actually read character end of Sozomen's work, according to their own histories later.^{[citation needed]} Therefore, most scholars act as if that the work actually came down to that year current that consequently it has reached us only in a dejected condition.

Other writings

According to historian accept scholar of Islam Michael Write down, Sozomen wrote that a quota of "Saracens" (Arabs) in Canaan had adopted Jewish laws suggest customs after coming into in with Jews and may have to one`s name been (according to Cook) high-mindedness forerunners of Islam and Muslims.

Sources

Sozomen borrowed heavily from other large quantity for his work.

The well-spring for about three fourths be useful to his material was the pamphlets of Socrates Scholasticus. The fictional relationship of those writers appears everywhere.^[11] Valesius asserted that Sozomen read Socrates, and Robert Hussey and Guldenpenning have proved that. For example, Socrates, in I.x, relates an anecdote which closure had heard, and says range neither Eusebius nor any added author reports it, yet that anecdote is found in Sozomen, I.xxii, the similarity of fear showing that the text flaxen Socrates was the source.

The extent of this dependence cannot be accurately determined. Sozomen threadbare the work of Socrates pass for a guide to sources extract order. In some matters, specified as in regard to grandeur Novatians, Sozomen is entirely secondary on Socrates.

But Sozomen did sob simply copy Socrates.

He went back to the principal profusion used by Socrates and provoke sources, often including more use up them than Socrates did.

He used the writings of Bishop, the first major Church archivist. The Vita Constantini of Historian is expressly cited in greatness description of the vision illustrate Constantine.

Sozomen appears also chitchat have consulted the Historia Athanasii and also the works corporeal Athanasius including the Vita Antonii.

He completes the statements match Socrates from the Apologia in defiance of Arianos, lix, sqq., and copies Athanasius' Adv. episcopos AEgypti, xviii-xix.

Rufinus is frequently used.

Instructive in this respect progression a comparison of Sozomen, Philosopher, and Rufinus on the ancy of Athanasius. Rufinus is integrity original; Socrates expressly states lapse he follows Rufinus, while Sozomen knows Socrates' version, but court case not satisfied with it impressive follows Rufinus more closely.

The ecclesiastical records used by Sozomen are principally taken from Sabinus, to whom he continually refers.

In this way he uses records of the synods go over the top with that of Tyre (335) turn that of Antioch in Caria (367).

For the period be different Theodosius I, Sozomen stopped mass the work of Socrates president followed Olympiodorus of Thebes, who was probably Sozomen's only temporal source. A comparison with Zosimus, who also made use game Olympiodorus, seems to show divagate the whole ninth book retard Sozomen, is mostly an brief extract from Olympiodorus.

Sozomen euphemistic pre-owned many other authorities. These prolong sources relating to Christianity in vogue Persia, monkish histories, the Vita Martini of Sulpicius Severus, loftiness works of Hilarius, logoi time off Eustathius of Antioch, the assassinate of Cyril of Jerusalem be in breach of Constantius concerning the miraculous sight of the cross, and Palladius.

He also used oral habit, adding some of the crest distinctive value to his groove.

Publication

The first printed (though untranslated) version of Sozomen, which was based on the Codex Regius of 1444, was that be totally convinced by Robert Estienne at Paris confine 1544.^[12] The first translated footpath to be published was stray of Christophorson, which appeared change for the better Latin in Geneva in 1612.^[13]

A noteworthy edition was done overstep Valesius (Cambridge, 1720), who old, besides the text of Stephens, a Codex Fucetianus (now surprise victory Paris, 1445), "Readings" of Savilius, and the indirect traditions inducing Theodorus Lector and of Cassiodorus-Epiphanius.

Hussey's posthumous edition (largely chart for the press by Convenience Barrow, who wrote the preface) is important, since in noisy the archetype of the Codex Regius, the Codex Baroccianus 142, is collated for the cardinal time. But this manuscript was written by various hands boss at various times and accordingly is not equally authoritative shrub border all its parts.

There decay an excellent English translation available in 1846 (London, Samuel Bagster and sons), translator unnamed, succeeding reprinted and credited to Metropolis David Hartranft (1839-1914), with top-hole learned though somewhat diffuse promotion, in the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, II (published New Dynasty, 1890). (This text is handy on-line at the Christian Liberal arts Ethereal Library.)

Notes

References

Citations

Sources

Attribution

Further reading

• On ethnic identity and ecclesiastical government in Sozomen, see:
  • Argov, Understanding I. (2005). "A Church Archivist in Search of an Identity: Aspects of Early Byzantine Mandate in Sozomen's Historia Ecclesiastica".

    Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum. 9 (2): 367–396. doi:10.1515/ZACH.2005.006. S2CID 170779831.

• The English construction of the Ecclesiastical History ascribed to Chester D. Hartranft crack available online:
  • Sozomen (1890). "Ecclesiastical History".

    In Schaff, Philip; Wace, Henry (eds.). Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series. Vol. 2. Translated by Chester D. Hartranft. Bison, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Commander. Retrieved 13 March 2016 – via New Advent.

• The English transcription of the Ecclesiastical History saturate Edward Walford as originally promulgated in the Bohn Ecclesiastical Deposit, is available in book form:

External links